2 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Ryan's avatar

A few points:

1) Palmer is better than Ode, so I’m not sure he’s the right player to be comparing with

2) if those are all their combined minutes then this is a very and intentionally misleading stat because we all know Ode was very meh for the entirety for his first 18 months in the PL. nobody has ever argued that fresh off the boat Ode was creating enough chances and it’s exactly what he was criticised for every week (too safe, likes to turn backwards rather than go for a harder through ball). A fairer comparison would be Ode over the last 30 months as only that period is when he’s been getting all the credit

But you already knew that

Expand full comment
raptora's avatar

- He got all the plaudits for having a high scoring campaign playing as a second forward. His creativity was always a problem. 25 assists in 5 PL seasons (4 full and 2 halves) is a damning statistic for an attacking midfielder. Best creators in the league have been close to reach that in one season (20 Henry and KDB). We're talking about FIVE full seasons.

- I originally intended to count only Odegaard's 22/23, 23/24 and 24/25 in comparison to Palmer's Chelsea two seasons - debut + this one. That would make him look equally bad. So here it is:

Big chances created

Odegaard - 36 - 7279 mins

Palmer - 33 - 4380 mins

Still not a good comparison, is it.

Expand full comment