Or the option of another formation that didn’t utilise either Partey or Timber? Possible or not ,I don’t know ?If it was.it was an unnecessary risk lets face it.
Or the option of another formation that didn’t utilise either Partey or Timber? Possible or not ,I don’t know ?If it was.It was an unnecessary risk lets face it.
This is the first argument that has been decent so far. A formation change might actually work. You would need to play Zinchenko LWB and may be Sterling as RWB to pull it off last saturday.
Or the option of another formation that didn’t utilise either Partey or Timber? Possible or not ,I don’t know ?If it was.It was an unnecessary risk lets face it.
This is the first argument that has been decent so far. A formation change might actually work. You would need to play Zinchenko LWB and may be Sterling as RWB to pull it off last saturday.
Hmmm, so we're back to my suggestion about Sterling. Took you a few days.
Nah, you said play him at RB in a back 4.