The futility of this argument is that you can’t decide how many points you need to win the league because it’s not up to you, it’s up to your strongest rival. Whatever they get, you need to get one more or equal with better GD
So if your measure of quality is only who lifts the title it means your measuring stick is nothing to do with how…
The futility of this argument is that you can’t decide how many points you need to win the league because it’s not up to you, it’s up to your strongest rival. Whatever they get, you need to get one more or equal with better GD
So if your measure of quality is only who lifts the title it means your measuring stick is nothing to do with how good or bad we are, ONLY if we are marginally better than our strongest rival.
If Son scores that late one v one vs city last week we are champions right here and now. And you would say arteta had been successful. But he didn’t, and we aren’t. So arteta failed?
The futility of this argument is that you can’t decide how many points you need to win the league because it’s not up to you, it’s up to your strongest rival. Whatever they get, you need to get one more or equal with better GD
So if your measure of quality is only who lifts the title it means your measuring stick is nothing to do with how good or bad we are, ONLY if we are marginally better than our strongest rival.
If Son scores that late one v one vs city last week we are champions right here and now. And you would say arteta had been successful. But he didn’t, and we aren’t. So arteta failed?