The loans that Chelsea did have from RA are no longer on the books so unless the rules are changed retrospectively I doubt that Chelsea, who sided with City at the hearing will be too worried about a sum being added back whereas owners like KSE, Bloom at Brighton and Foley at Bournemouth will be far more concerned going forward indeed…
The loans that Chelsea did have from RA are no longer on the books so unless the rules are changed retrospectively I doubt that Chelsea, who sided with City at the hearing will be too worried about a sum being added back whereas owners like KSE, Bloom at Brighton and Foley at Bournemouth will be far more concerned going forward indeed unless loans are turned into equity or accounted for in some different way the likelihood is that a £60 million hole over a 3 year PSR period will have to be dealt with.
I can't find article I read, I personally have no idea about this topic but author was arguing all clubs are currently in compliance with APT rules, so some clubs might have to change strategy in future but they are fine now.
I dont remember details but he was arguing chavs could be in trouble with this ruling. Chavs might have sided with ManCheaty at the hearing but that doesn't mean they delighted with details of today ruling.
Jwl
The loans that Chelsea did have from RA are no longer on the books so unless the rules are changed retrospectively I doubt that Chelsea, who sided with City at the hearing will be too worried about a sum being added back whereas owners like KSE, Bloom at Brighton and Foley at Bournemouth will be far more concerned going forward indeed unless loans are turned into equity or accounted for in some different way the likelihood is that a £60 million hole over a 3 year PSR period will have to be dealt with.
I can't find article I read, I personally have no idea about this topic but author was arguing all clubs are currently in compliance with APT rules, so some clubs might have to change strategy in future but they are fine now.
I dont remember details but he was arguing chavs could be in trouble with this ruling. Chavs might have sided with ManCheaty at the hearing but that doesn't mean they delighted with details of today ruling.