Flappy aside all our players are back in training, Arsenal have options for the run in, Vermaelen will be back for United.

by & filed under Uncategorized.

Is that a good thing though? Yes of course it is! With Liverpool up next followed quickly by the Spuds, we have the players available to mix it, not sure I would though, me, I believe in keeping a winning team going.

I think the news that we have Song and Diaby fit is good for that DM role, we also have Ramsey and Wilshere that can play there but having Vermaelen back also means we have him or Kozzer that could be drafted in should we need them, we have options at last.

Don’t forget though, for Vermaelen this will be like pre-season, so don’t expect too much.

A lot has been made of Suarez and Carroll, I don’t think Carroll is anywhere near as good as his publicity, he’s just tall and English, Suarez on the other hand I rate, I also wanted him in the summer and he’s the one I would watch.

I think both teams will attack and that should make for an open game, but we have a massive advantage, last night I had a dream, and we were two up, I never finished that dream and we do have a nasty habit of losing leads but I think at two nil with 10 to go, it should be enough.

Many people think that a resurgent Liverpool will be a handful, but they said that about the spuds and we hammered them early in the season, the problem was we lost the game in the end, but I believe we have improved dramatically since then and Kozzer and Djourou are beginning to look secure.

Having Vermaelen back just tightens that up but I think he could play in that Song role a lot better than Song can, I know many will disagree but that’s just my opinion.

Diaby fit will give Wenger a headache as they are his two favourites so who will he choose? Me it would have to be Diaby, both lose the ball equally, but Diaby wins the ball back better and is much more of an attacking threat, Diaby on his day is a top player, but only on his day though!

I think a win against Liverpool will fill this team with confidence and that’s what we need before Wednesday, win this and we could still win the league, lose it and we could fold like a cheap pack of cards bought from a card boot sale on a caravan park.

We still have a whole day to train and see who is fit enough, I can’t wait to see the game, I can’t wait to see who he selects, as long as it’s not Squillaci, Denilson or Rosicky I’ll be okay, he may even use a Chamakh up front, I would prefer he didn’t because we need shots raining down on them from the off, unfortunately doesn’t know how to do that yet.

I hear Marseille are making him their numero uno in the summer, I wouldn’t be upset, get shot of him and Bendtner and bring in two proper goalscorers, now that would be good, or a cheeky bid for Torres, £25mil anyone? Wenger would have to admit he was wrong though and we all know he’s above that, so don’t hold your breath!

Have a great day grovers, the business end begins tomorrow!

366 Responses to “Flappy aside all our players are back in training, Arsenal have options for the run in, Vermaelen will be back for United.”

Jump to comment form ↓

  1. zeus

    Boozy

    I’ve heard that touted by Geoff and others. Maybe tv5 could work there. He has all the attributes. And he would be a serious goal threat.

    Not at the expense of our cb pairing though.

  2. Lurch LeRouge

    if we get a top top class CB then yeah he can rotate there, but I’d still want another powerful DM.

  3. zeus

    Swedish Gun says:
    April 16, 2011 at 21:02
    Real M – Barca 2-1

    Mourinhooo said to the fans and board:

    “I tried it your way and got thumped 5-0, lets try it my way now”

    *********
    at least the cunt is honest and judging from that first half he is right. Madrid should be leading though they are losing the possession count.

    Villa-boas has 4 more games to guide porto through to ‘match’ our invincibles feat.
    Only 30 games in the season though.

  4. Swedish Gun

    LL

    the obvious being casillas,ramos,alonso,khedira,ronaldo,demaria,benzema,alves,xavi,iniesta,messi,villa??

    :)

  5. Rohan

    There also goes the “record” of Messi never scoring against a team managed by Mourinho.

    Game over.

    Mourinho can go and suck his cock. Atleast we beat Barca at home. :D

  6. Rohan

    Yeah was just about to say that Lurch. The view from behind the striker is quite a nice touch. Wonder how they’re managing that? Are they lowering a camera from up above?

  7. Lurch LeRouge

    its a system thats been around a while rohan, cameras on a gyro that has servo’s connected to guide wires that can move pretty much all over the pitch, to go up and down they just slacken the wires. its pretty mad tech.

  8. Rohan

    Very cool, Lurch. They should implement that in the premiership, it being the league with the most money and all that.

    Servos? haha takes me back to the days I used to play around with robotics for fun. good days those.

  9. albo

    gambon says:
    April 16, 2011 at 19:10
    Oh dear…..AKBs up and down the land have declared that spending money doesnt mean a better team, and guess what?..

    City are gonna win a trophy…something we arent capable of!

    Haha. You’re writing as if Chelsea didn’t prove that about 5 years ago! Man City winning a semi final is the proof you were waiting for was it?! ;-)

  10. Rohan

    Not to mention that I respect Barcelona for their football even though I hate everything else about them.

    Madrid are just a bunch of rich bastards trying to beat Barca by outspending them. Hate the whole Galacticos thingy.

  11. Rohan

    Is it possible to be completely neutral when watching a football game?

    Don’t think so. Even if it’s Spurs Chelsea, I always end up rooting for someone.

  12. albo

    What the AST report doesnt say is the amount of money we have spend on under aged kids.

    Every top club spends a fortune on their academy and youth project. We’re certainly not different. But ‘spent’ in terms of transfer fees IS at least included in the figures I noted.

    Where the money goes to in our back room staff and and how much profit we have made in the property development.

    Well, I know nothing about other clubs, but I’d imagine they spend very similar amounts on their backroom staff. And we haven’t yet made profit from the property, we’ve simply paid off the loan. Any profit we make from property is yet to be realised. (The AST does actually mention that)

    Because we did make a bit of a profit there. It strictly looks at the footballing aspect of things.

    No, it deals with the finances as a whole. See above.

    That aside, if we had a different man running the club we would not be spending that much money on kids that never make it.

    Perhaps, but actually Tim Payton confirmed to Pedro that actually our kids aren’t paid huge amounts. And the transfer fees for those kids are included in the figures, so the net £37 million still stands.

    We would not have sold our better players like TH, PV, et al for peanuts and a hand job

    Well, surely David Dein would have handled those negotiations, not Wenger? Right?

    We would not be waiting the midnight hour arguing over 1million over a proven international keeper

    Again, wouldn’t that be either Dein (or later Gazidis) who deals with that?

    In your attempt to look at AFC half full you ignore the facts and end up sound like you just had a mouth full of Wengers bowel movements.

    You make the odd valid point until you resort to the insults again. I actually made most of the negative points you make about Wenger’s tactics and refusal to strengthen key areas in my original post, though you seem to ignore that.

    And in financial terms, the points you have made are pretty superficial compared to the overall point I made about the money that was available. Every club has an academy, and from what I have read, if we spend more on ours than other top clubs it is a pretty negligible amount more.

    The whole point of my post was exactly that – people obsessing with (relatively) smaller details and negatives and ignoring the bigger picture…

  13. zeus

    Rohan says:
    April 16, 2011 at 22:14
    Pepe’s quite impressive isn’t he. Never rated him but today..

    ******

    What the fuck?! Never rated him, are you mad. He is the only defender that has cost 25m that didnt make me raise an eyebrow when I heard of the sale.

    Acted like a cunt when he kicked that player about 5 times HARD in the back and got a 10 game ban though.

  14. albo

    ON the bright side, Barca drawing now means we can do one of those silly aggregate score comparisons that Gambon likes so much!

    Barca beat Real 6-1 and us 4-3 so we are like…63.7869% better than Real Madrid…or something…

  15. Swedish Gun

    Do we have more money coming in from property??

    if so how much?

    I thought that was done and dusted and paid of towards the loan

  16. albo

    Swedish Gun – not sure how much, but there is profit still to come. The big announcement was cos we had paid off the loan, rather than cos we had realised all the profit we were going to.

    The impression from the AST is that that profit will come in over the next couple of years and will tie us over until the new sponsorship deal comes in…

  17. MatthewT

    albo

    If you are not on Wenger’s payroll you have been gyped, you are constantly on here making excuses for failure and incompetence.

  18. Swedish Gun

    Tough game tomorrow…hard to predict. We have a full strength squad more or less so we should win imo

    But then again I have this silly feeling we will see a red that will spoil the day

    2-0 if nothing stupid happens
    0-1 if the silly feeling comes into play

  19. albo

    Full strength I’d fancy us to win Swedish. But if Djourou and co are lacking match fitness, we might be in trouble…

  20. gnarleygeorge9

    Oh wow the boys with the most money beat the boys with the most debt.

    Wow business must be booming lurch, do u ever get off your arse & do anything other than be a smart arse on here :lol:

    Ha Ha Ha Lunch Laughed outa Australia. & now laughed @ from Australia :lol: See ya dodey, business calls

  21. Swedish Gun

    I think we end up 3rd but got a little glimmer of hope now that both chezzer and djourou is back

    can everyone STAY fit then mby mby…..

  22. Albo

    I know this is a total cop out, Swedish, but this has been such a bonkers season I just don’t see how anyone can call any of it. I mean, if a few weeks ago you had told me that, despite having our entire strikeforce fit, we would struggle to score goals against Sunderland and Blackburn I’d have laughed at you!

    I do think the 4 will probably be Man U, Us, Chelsea, Man City and I must say I’ll be really surprised if Man U don’t win it. But beyond that, who fucking knows…

  23. gambon

    “Madrid are just a bunch of rich bastards trying to beat Barca by outspending them. Hate the whole Galacticos thingy”

    True Wenger student…

    Money is evil, money is evil, over 25 year olds are evil, non frenchmen are evil.

  24. Lurch LeRouge

    oh dear

    AW

    I read an article in a French newspaper this week that at Rayo Vallecano, who are [joint-]top of the Spanish second division, some players have not been paid for a year. Some players cannot pay their mortgages! We want to run our business properly, with income that is produced by our business. I want to sit here in September and see who respects the financial fair play.”

  25. zeus

    On the question of kroenke, is there no billionaires in England? Why do I never hear that some Englishman is looking to buy some club in the PL.

  26. Dom

    i rate adam johnson more than hazzad, if city can get that illusive CL spot. we should make a bid for him. maybe around 15m

Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or sign in here:

    Connect with Facebook

  • (will not be published)

First time commenters will go into moderation.


Jump to top ↑

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>